Posts Tagged ‘Environment’

D.C. trip explores key issues

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

The DFW Delegation from the Dallas Regional and Fort Worth Chambers pose on the steps of our nation's Capitol before the day's briefings.
The DFW Delegation from the Dallas Regional and Fort Worth Chambers pose on the steps of our nation’s Capitol before the day’s briefings.

The Fort Worth Chamber’s bi-annual Congressional Summit put a delegation of Fort Worth Chamber members face-to-face with elected officials and other policymakers in Washington, D.C., last week.

Discussions covered a wide range of issues. While the Chamber group arrived with priority concerns, they placed a premium on briefings from policymakers.

“We have always left it to the legislators to talk candidly to us,” said Brinton Payne, the Chamber’s vice president of Government-Urban Affairs. “We wanted a sense of what’s happening in Washington and how it may translate and affect our members.”

Andrew K. Johnsen, assistant vice president of Governmental Affairs for BNSF Railway, said the trip was important because “competition occurs not just in the marketplace but among states and regions of the country.”

The trip demonstrated that “our community is united and committed to the priorities of a bright future,” Johnsen said, adding that he was looking for “a confirmation that we have alignment with our congressional delegation on the region’s priorities.”

Fran Eichorst, vice president of public affairs for Fidelity Investments, agreed, noting: “Fidelity welcomes any opportunity to meet with policymakers to discuss issues of interest or concern to them and to serve as a resource for them whenever possible. Likewise, we appreciate the chance to raise and discuss issues and concerns of the business community with Members of the Texas Congressional delegation and explore ways in which we may work together.”

Pollard Rogers, managing partner at Cantey Hanger, said the trip facilitated “a better understanding of the issues affecting our region and businesses.” Rogers said he wanted to gather “concrete ideas for creating support for political initiatives on a local level” and then communicate those ideas to clients.

Summit sponsors were Lockheed Martin, Cantey Hanger, LLP, North Texas Commission and TXU Energy.

For the first time, the Fort Worth Chamber’s summit trip was carried out jointly with members and staff of the Dallas Regional Chamber of Commerce and Dallas business leaders.

“The joint trip came out of a relationship that formed around shared interests related to water issues two Texas legislative sessions ago,” Payne said.

“Going to Washington together made sense in light of the importance that regionalism has attained as we all address matters of common interest, such as infrastructure and other growth-related priorities. Together, we created an opportunity to hear from a multitude of legislators and strengthen our relationship with our neighbors to the east.

“For the most part, the chambers have the same goals.”

Another first involved the Chamber’s use of social media to give members real-time reports.

“In addition to reporting the trip in our newsletter, the ‘virtual DC experience’ was communicated in real time via Facebook and Twitter to Chamber members and fans who are on those networks,” said Andra Bennett, the Chamber’s director of Communications.

“This allowed those followers to give immediate feedback to the staff and member delegation while they were in D.C.”

Members of Texas’ congressional delegation and Texas Senators John Cornyn and Kay Bailey Hutchison met with the Chamber groups April 21. An international dinner that night was keynoted by Ambassador Ron Kirk of Dallas.

On April 22, the Department of Defense briefed the Chamber delegations at the Pentagon, followed by a tour of the memorial there. They also visited Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Sensors and received a private tour of the USS Fort Worth model.

Prior to the trip, the Fort Worth Chamber conducted an informal poll of membership to get a general sense of issues that were top-of-mind among members.

More than 400 responses focused primarily on energy, transportation, labor policy, economic policy, health care, national defense and tax policy.

Economic policy was the leading priority among more than 32 percent of respondents followed by taxes and health care, which were both identified as top priorities among more than 23 percent of respondents.

More links

ACES Climate Legislation deals mixed hand

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

cards2
click to see full-size graphic

New cap-and-trade climate legislation aimed at reducing greenhouse-gas emissions in the United States and setting the country on a path to a low-carbon economy faces an indifferent public and rocky paths through Congress in 2010.

“The jury is still out” on whether such legislation could achieve the goal of reducing global warming, said Sarah Walls, a partner with Fort Worth law firm Cantey Hanger and an expert on the measures.

It’s clear, however, that current legislation would stick U.S. business and industry with crippling spikes in energy costs that would be passed on to consumers, said Luke Bellsnyder, executive director of the Austin-based Texas Association of Manufacturers.

“It’s in the best interest of U.S. businesses to take every step possible to reduce potentially harmful emissions,” he said, but with projections estimating the legislation would have scant effect on global temperatures “why decrease our nation’s global competitiveness with no discernible (global) environmental impact?”

“This Chamber has supported clean air initiatives for years and supports environmental stewardship,” said Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Bill Thornton. “Our quality of life is a critical factor in attracting businesses and talent.

“However, we do not support the cap-and-trade legislation as it is currently because it is overly punitive to energy industry states like Texas” – one of many concerns raised in congressional debate over the legislation.

Walls and Bellsnyder recently briefed Fort Worth Chamber committees on aspects of the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES), which the U.S. House passed, 219-212, in June. Walls provided an overview of the bill. Bellsnyder discussed related private-sector concerns.

The measure, introduced by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and co-sponsored by Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), is under Senate scrutiny. Its stated goal is to “create clean energy jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce global warming pollution and transition to a clean energy economy.” It would impact electric utilities, natural gas producers, oil refiners and manufacturers with on-site energy production.

The bill’s cap-and-trade system would “provide regulated companies with a certain number of ‘allowances’ (each allowance is permission to emit one ton of greenhouse gases),” Walls said, “but these ‘caps’ on emissions would be lowered each year. To comply with these caps, companies would have to buy more allowances from other companies, or continue to reduce their emissions.

“Companies subject to the bill would also be allowed to trade, purchase, or create credits to offset a portion of their greenhouse gas emissions. The legislation does not restrict who can hold an allowance or offset credit, and envisions a market in which those businesses and other investors can trade, sell, and buy allowances and offset credits.

“This market could provide even (Cantey Hanger) non-industrial clients with an opportunity for gain. Offset credits such as those created by reforesting an area can be created by anyone and sold on the market.”

In those respects, Walls said, cap-and-trade “incorporates some elements of a free market, and thus most businesses prefer it” to governmental restrictions on emissions.

She also noted that on Jan. 1, the EPA “will require approximately 10,000 facilities in 29 categories to report the amount of their greenhouse gas emissions to EPA.”

The ripple effect of ACES would be “enormous,” Bellsnyder said. “President Obama has publicly stated that energy prices will ‘necessarily skyrocket.’ U.S. industries that are struggling in this economy, and losing ground to competitors in Asia, will see drastic energy price increases, and increased overhead.

“Many manufacturers will either curtail hiring and output or pull up stakes in the U.S. and move their production facilities overseas.”

The public knows little about ACES, Walls and Bellsnyder agree. A recent survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that 35 percent of respondents believe that global warming is a serious problem (down from 44 percent in April 2008) and few are following climate legislation debate. Some 55 percent of those surveyed said they had not heard of cap-and-trade policies.

Bellsnyder doubts that ACES will pass during a mid-term election year. Walls expects some version of climate legislation to pass, but “if not, the EPA will issue further regulations restricting greenhouse gas emissions. A rule restricting emissions by cars and light trucks is expected to become final in March.”

There are strong alternatives to current climate legislation, Bellsnyder said. “Viable alternatives is a great way to discuss this issue.

“Cap and trade is truly not viable in reducing global GHG emissions. I believe that state and federal policymakers should focus on incentivizing businesses to develop products and processes to reduce GHG emissions.”

That would include “energy-efficiency products and carbon-capture technologies,” he said, “many of which are being utilized in Texas today to extract previously unattainable oil and gas reserves.

“The best solutions include the promotion of cost-effective and proven energy production such as nuclear power, which is a zero-carbon product, and the development of energy storage — batteries.

“When electricity storage becomes a reality, renewable energy such as wind and solar power will become far more effective and viable.”

More links:

Text of H.R. 2454 (American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009).

Sightline Institute’s quick-read look at Cap and Trade and Waxman-Markey bill.

Heritage Foundation’s view of Waxman-Markey.

Rating the 81st Legislature

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

click to see full-size graphic
click to see full-size graphic

“America’s 50 greenest cities”

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

From the February 2008 Popular Science article “America’s 50 greenest cities”

Rankings’ methodology:
Popular Science gathered raw data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Geographic Society’s Green Guide, which contained survey data and government statistics, for American cities with more than 100,000 population, in more than 30 categories, including air quality, electricity use and transportation habits. The information then was compiled into four categories; each was given 5 or 10 possible points. Cities were ranked according to the sum of the four scores.
The categories and points assigned along with Popular Science’s description of each:

  • Electricity (E; 10 points): Cities score points for drawing their energy from renewable sources such as wind, solar, biomass and hydroelectric power, as well as for offering incentives for residents to invest in their own power sources, like roof-mounted solar panels.
  • Transportation (T; 10 points): High scores go to cities whose commuters take public transportation or carpool. Air quality also plays a role.
  • Green living (G; 5 points): Cities earn points for the number of buildings certified by the U.S. Green Building Council, as well as for devoting area to green space, such as public parks and nature preserves.
  • Recycling and green perspective (R; 5 points): This measures how comprehensive a city’s recycling program is (if the city collects old electronics, for example) and how important its citizens consider environmental issues.

How Fort Worth landed 15th place
– Electricity: 8.3
– Transportation: 4.6
– Green Living: 2.4
– Recycling/Perspective: 4.4
– Total: 19.7 points

What do you think about the new Chamberletter format?

Click here to send us your feedback or email chamberletter@fortworthchamber.com.

An Eco-Friendly post office

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

The U.S. Post Office on Eighth Avenue was the U.S. Postal Service’s first green facility. Designed by Quorum Architects of Fort Worth, the station opened in January 1999. Since then, USPS has built more green facilities and more are planned.

“The building is primarily constructed from recycled materials, uses some of the most innovative energy-efficient systems available, and includes features to improve indoor air quality,” the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reports.

“Some of the environmental attributes included in the building were the installation of skylights, use of paints and adhesives with zero or low volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and use of organic (not chemical) fertilizers for the station’s grounds.”

Some of the details:

  • Indigenous landscaping.
  • 20 percent recycled-content concrete (contains fly ash).
  • Recycled-content gypsum board and ceiling tiles.
  • 90 percent post-consumer recycled-content steel.
  • Recycled-content dock bumpers and floor mats (contains recycled tires).
  • Recycled-content plastic toilet partitions, tree grates, and workroom bumpers.
  • Heat-reflecting exterior ceramic coating system.
  • Energy-efficient low-emissivity glazing.
  • Natural lighting supplemented by energy-efficient fluorescent lighting with automatic dimming controls.
  • Full spectrum lighting.
  • Occupancy sensors installed in frequently used rooms.
  • High-efficiency heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system.
  • Rainwater harvesting system for irrigation.
  • Compressed straw exterior wall panels made from alternative agricultural products.
  • Compressed natural gas refueling station for fleet vehicles.

SOURCE: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, www.epa.gov

What do you think about the new Chamberletter format?

Click here to send us your feedback or email chamberletter@fortworthchamber.com.

Interest in Green Building Blooms

Sunday, June 1st, 2008

Concerns about Earth’s environment and pressures from spikes in energy costs have stoked urgency in realizing economies from “green” buildings.

A concept that got traction in the ’90s, eco-friendly “green” efficiencies are drawing heavy national attention as the solution to many needs, from efficient use of water and electricity to reducing pollutants and creating healthier work environments.

U.S. Post Office on Eighth Avenue

In downtown Fort Worth, the futuristic $200 million RadioShack Riverfront Campus, opened in 2005, stands as the gleaming premiere example of green building, incorporating exceptionally efficient energy- and water-management systems, recycled materials and many other green features.

Popular Science magazine recently ranked Fort Worth 15th among the 50 greenest cities in the United States. Yet, locally, green building is in its infancy, says Jyl DeHaven, CEO of Green Urban Development and one of the foremost advocates of green practices. “But people, from Fortune 500 companies to consumers, are starting to ‘get’ it.”

Many local green projects are in the planning stage, Jack Baxley, executive vice president of the QUOIN chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America, said. Some observers expect up to $60 billion in green construction throughout the Metroplex within five years.

The chief attractions?

Green techniques “make your building more economical,” DeHaven said. “Operating expenses are lower. Quality, cleaner environments increase marketability and can command higher rents. There’s a huge health benefit” in a green work environment. “Research shows productivity improvements and fewer sick days.”

DeHaven’s showcasing those benefits in her Urban Race Street development on Fort Worth’s near east side. With nearly 120,000 square feet of retail, office and loft space, the project exudes energy efficiency and environmental sensitivity.

Her green commitment runs deeply via involvement with many community initiatives, including the City of Fort Worth‘s Sustainability Task Force.

DeHaven and Baxley co-chair the task force that was formed last year to develop guidelines for public and private use in making Fort Worth the greenest city in the U.S.

U.S. Post Office on Eighth AvenueA draft final report, with an emphasis on energy and water conservation, will be ready soon, Brian Boerner, director of the Department of Environmental Management, said.

“The city wants to get all of its buildings certified as meeting the LEED silver standard,” he said, referring to one of the U.S. Green Building Council’s four levels (basic, silver, gold and platinum) outlined in its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System.

The non-profit USGBC consists of more than 15,000 organizations in the building industry aiming “to advance structures that are environmentally responsible, profitable, and healthy places to live and work.” Its LEED certifications are the national standards for high-performance environmental construction.

Criteria, based on buildings’ environmental impact, center on sustainable site development, water savings, energy efficiency, materials selection and indoor environmental quality.

In the U.S., USGBC research found, buildings account for 36 percent of total energy use and 65 percent of electricity consumption; 30 percent of greenhouse gas emissions; 30 percent of raw materials use; 30 percent of waste output (136 million tons annually), and 12 percent of potable water consumption.

Green buildings reduce that impact.

It’s win-win, Baxley says. “This is not just a fad. The time is right. This is going to stick.”

More links:

What do you think about the new Chamberletter format?

Click here to send us your feedback or email chamberletter@fortworthchamber.com.