City Budget Recommendations - District 2 - Sal Espino

Results
Number of records in this district: 107
Total records in survey: 884
Percentage of total: 12.10%

 

1. To what extent are you aware of the City's budget situation?
Answer Count Percentage
Aware of the details 51 47.66%  
Don't know the details 43 40.19%  
Not aware of situation 13 12.15%  

2. How important to our residents and/or to your neighborhood is the City's financial situation?
Answer Count Percentage
Critical 44 41.12%  
Important 56 52.34%  
Somewhat important 7 6.54%  
Not important 0 0.00%

3. If you were in the City Manager's chair, what approach to reducing expenses would you likely take?
Answer Count Percentage
Across the board cuts in all departments (includes police, fire, streets) - $38.5 million 18 16.82%  
Strategic cuts resulting in reduction of public services - $23 million 23 21.50%  
Significant reductions or elimination of non-critical services (i.e., libraries, economic development, senior citizens assistance) - $35.7 million 32 29.91%  
Smaller reductions or elimination of non-critical services - $9.4 million 34 31.78%  

4. Please indicate the top 3 expense areas you would reduce to help balance the 2011 budget. (Some areas have been grouped for the purpose of this survey.)
Answer Count Percentage
Police 7 6.54%  
Fire 7 6.54%  
Planning, zoning and development 15 14.02%  
Libraries, parks, community centers, etc. 25 23.36%  
Road construction, street repairs 4 3.74%  
Facility maintenance 24 22.43%  
City code enforcement, animal care and control 24 22.43%  
Municipal court services 15 14.02%  
Economic and community development programs 33 30.84%  
Resident communication / customer service 13 12.15%  
Administrative services - financial management, legal, human resources 52 48.60%  
Pension contributions to City employees' retirement funds 28 26.17%  
New vehicle purchases 74 69.16%  

5. If you were in the City Manager's chair, what approach to increasing revenues would you take?
Answer Count Percentage
Across the board – consider property tax increase, reducing or eliminating homestead exemptions, using rainy day funds and gas well revenues. – up to $105 million 25 23.36%  
Use only tax-related options that can be applied to both operating budget and debt service (funds would be ongoing, i.e. property tax increase, homestead elimination / reductions) – up to $39.2 million 9 8.41%  
No tax increases. Use some or all of available rainy day funds, gas well revenues. (note: only available for one year) -- up to $66.4 million) 73 68.22%  

6. Please indicate the top 3 revenue options you would consider to help balance the 2011 budget.
Answer Count Percentage
Raise property taxes by 2 cents 14 13.08%  
Raise property taxes by 4 cents 5 4.67%  
Reduce homestead exemption (does not include senior tax freeze, over 65 or disabled) 8 7.48%  
Eliminate homestead exemption (does not include senior tax freeze, over 65 or disabled) 2 1.87%  
Use rainy day funds that exceed required reserve balances 65 60.75%  
Use gas well revenue from property tax on minerals 93 86.92%  
Use gas well revenue from bonuses, royalties and pipeline licenses 95 88.79%  
Transportation user / developer impact fees 39 36.45%  

7. Years you have lived in Fort Worth
Answer Count Percentage
0-10 63 58.88%  
10-25 17 15.89%  
25-40 20 18.69%  
Over 40 7 6.54%