City Budget Recommendations - District 3 - Zim Zimmerman

Results
Number of records in this district: 179
Total records in survey: 884
Percentage of total: 20.25%

 

1. To what extent are you aware of the City's budget situation?
Answer Count Percentage
Aware of the details 92 51.40%  
Don't know the details 77 43.02%  
Not aware of situation 10 5.59%  

2. How important to our residents and/or to your neighborhood is the City's financial situation?
Answer Count Percentage
Critical 74 41.34%  
Important 93 51.96%  
Somewhat important 11 6.15%  
Not important 1 0.56%  

3. If you were in the City Manager's chair, what approach to reducing expenses would you likely take?
Answer Count Percentage
Across the board cuts in all departments (includes police, fire, streets) - $38.5 million 49 27.37%  
Strategic cuts resulting in reduction of public services - $23 million 56 31.28%  
Significant reductions or elimination of non-critical services (i.e., libraries, economic development, senior citizens assistance) - $35.7 million 37 20.67%  
Smaller reductions or elimination of non-critical services - $9.4 million 37 20.67%  

4. Please indicate the top 3 expense areas you would reduce to help balance the 2011 budget. (Some areas have been grouped for the purpose of this survey.)
Answer Count Percentage
Police 15 8.38%  
Fire 9 5.03%  
Planning, zoning and development 49 27.37%  
Libraries, parks, community centers, etc. 20 11.17%  
Road construction, street repairs 11 6.15%  
Facility maintenance 31 17.32%  
City code enforcement, animal care and control 31 17.32%  
Municipal court services 19 10.61%  
Economic and community development programs 73 40.78%  
Resident communication / customer service 30 16.76%  
Administrative services - financial management, legal, human resources 76 42.46%  
Pension contributions to City employees' retirement funds 52 29.05%  
New vehicle purchases 121 67.60%  

5. If you were in the City Manager's chair, what approach to increasing revenues would you take?
Answer Count Percentage
Across the board – consider property tax increase, reducing or eliminating homestead exemptions, using rainy day funds and gas well revenues. – up to $105 million 42 23.46%  
Use only tax-related options that can be applied to both operating budget and debt service (funds would be ongoing, i.e. property tax increase, homestead elimination / reductions) – up to $39.2 million 19 10.61%  
No tax increases. Use some or all of available rainy day funds, gas well revenues. (note: only available for one year) -- up to $66.4 million) 118 65.92%  

6. Please indicate the top 3 revenue options you would consider to help balance the 2011 budget.
Answer Count Percentage
Raise property taxes by 2 cents 30 16.76%  
Raise property taxes by 4 cents 10 5.59%  
Reduce homestead exemption (does not include senior tax freeze, over 65 or disabled) 21 11.73%  
Eliminate homestead exemption (does not include senior tax freeze, over 65 or disabled) 3 1.68%  
Use rainy day funds that exceed required reserve balances 115 64.25%  
Use gas well revenue from property tax on minerals 135 75.42%  
Use gas well revenue from bonuses, royalties and pipeline licenses 154 86.03%  
Transportation user / developer impact fees 69 38.55%  

7. Years you have lived in Fort Worth
Answer Count Percentage
0-10 29 16.20%  
10-25 59 32.96%  
25-40 49 27.37%  
Over 40 42 23.46%