City Budget Recommendations - District 6 - Jungus Jordan
| Results | |
|---|---|
| Number of records in this district: | 97 |
| Total records in survey: | 884 |
| Percentage of total: | 10.97% |
| 1. To what extent are you aware of the City's budget situation? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Aware of the details | 52 | 53.61% | |
| Don't know the details | 40 | 41.24% | |
| Not aware of situation | 5 | 5.15% | |
![]() |
|||
| 2. How important to our residents and/or to your neighborhood is the City's financial situation? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Critical | 44 | 45.36% | |
| Important | 43 | 44.33% | |
| Somewhat important | 8 | 8.25% | |
| Not important | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Other | 2 | 2.06% | |
![]() |
|||
| 3. If you were in the City Manager's chair, what approach to reducing expenses would you likely take? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Across the board cuts in all departments (includes police, fire, streets) - $38.5 million | 31 | 31.96% | |
| Strategic cuts resulting in reduction of public services - $23 million | 25 | 25.77% | |
| Significant reductions or elimination of non-critical services (i.e., libraries, economic development, senior citizens assistance) - $35.7 million | 16 | 16.49% | |
| Smaller reductions or elimination of non-critical services - $9.4 million | 25 | 25.77% | |
![]() |
|||
| 4. Please indicate the top 3 expense areas you would reduce to help balance the 2011 budget. (Some areas have been grouped for the purpose of this survey.) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Police | 8 | 8.25% | |
| Fire | 7 | 7.22% | |
| Planning, zoning and development | 34 | 35.05% | |
| Libraries, parks, community centers, etc. | 20 | 20.62% | |
| Road construction, street repairs | 5 | 5.15% | |
| Facility maintenance | 11 | 11.34% | |
| City code enforcement, animal care and control | 16 | 16.49% | |
| Municipal court services | 11 | 11.34% | |
| Economic and community development programs | 31 | 31.96% | |
| Resident communication / customer service | 14 | 14.43% | |
| Administrative services - financial management, legal, human resources | 40 | 41.24% | |
| Pension contributions to City employees' retirement funds | 28 | 28.87% | |
| New vehicle purchases | 66 | 68.04% | |
![]() |
|||
| 5. If you were in the City Manager's chair, what approach to increasing revenues would you take? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Across the board – consider property tax increase, reducing or eliminating homestead exemptions, using rainy day funds and gas well revenues. – up to $105 million | 22 | 22.68% | |
| Use only tax-related options that can be applied to both operating budget and debt service (funds would be ongoing, i.e. property tax increase, homestead elimination / reductions) – up to $39.2 million | 9 | 9.28% | |
| No tax increases. Use some or all of available rainy day funds, gas well revenues. (note: only available for one year) -- up to $66.4 million) | 66 | 68.04% | |
![]() |
|||
| 6. Please indicate the top 3 revenue options you would consider to help balance the 2011 budget. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Raise property taxes by 2 cents | 21 | 21.65% | |
| Raise property taxes by 4 cents | 6 | 6.19% | |
| Reduce homestead exemption (does not include senior tax freeze, over 65 or disabled) | 13 | 13.40% | |
| Eliminate homestead exemption (does not include senior tax freeze, over 65 or disabled) | 3 | 3.09% | |
| Use rainy day funds that exceed required reserve balances | 52 | 53.61% | |
| Use gas well revenue from property tax on minerals | 78 | 80.41% | |
| Use gas well revenue from bonuses, royalties and pipeline licenses | 82 | 84.54% | |
| Transportation user / developer impact fees | 36 | 37.11% | |
![]() |
|||
| 7. Years you have lived in Fort Worth | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| 0-10 | 19 | 19.59% | |
| 10-25 | 36 | 37.11% | |
| 25-40 | 23 | 23.71% | |
| Over 40 | 19 | 19.59% | |
![]() |
|||