City Budget Recommendations - District 9 - Joel Burns

Results
Number of records in this district: 135
Total records in survey: 884
Percentage of total: 15.27%

 

1. To what extent are you aware of the City's budget situation?
Answer Count Percentage
Aware of the details 78 57.78%  
Don't know the details 53 39.26%  
Not aware of situation 4 2.96%  

2. How important to our residents and/or to your neighborhood is the City's financial situation?
Answer Count Percentage
Critical 51 37.78%  
Important 77 57.04%  
Somewhat important 7 5.19%  
Not important 0 0.00%

3. If you were in the City Manager's chair, what approach to reducing expenses would you likely take?
Answer Count Percentage
Across the board cuts in all departments (includes police, fire, streets) - $38.5 million 38 28.15%  
Strategic cuts resulting in reduction of public services - $23 million 46 34.07%  
Significant reductions or elimination of non-critical services (i.e., libraries, economic development, senior citizens assistance) - $35.7 million 29 21.48%  
Smaller reductions or elimination of non-critical services - $9.4 million 22 16.30%  

4. Please indicate the top 3 expense areas you would reduce to help balance the 2011 budget. (Some areas have been grouped for the purpose of this survey.)
Answer Count Percentage
Police 7 5.19%  
Fire 8 5.93%  
Planning, zoning and development 28 20.74%  
Libraries, parks, community centers, etc. 18 13.33%  
Road construction, street repairs 9 6.67%  
Facility maintenance 21 15.56%  
City code enforcement, animal care and control 34 25.19%  
Municipal court services 19 14.07%  
Economic and community development programs 48 35.56%  
Resident communication / customer service 25 18.52%  
Administrative services - financial management, legal, human resources 54 40.00%  
Pension contributions to City employees' retirement funds 40 29.63%  
New vehicle purchases 94 69.63%  

5. If you were in the City Manager's chair, what approach to increasing revenues would you take?
Answer Count Percentage
Across the board – consider property tax increase, reducing or eliminating homestead exemptions, using rainy day funds and gas well revenues. – up to $105 million 37 27.41%  
Use only tax-related options that can be applied to both operating budget and debt service (funds would be ongoing, i.e. property tax increase, homestead elimination / reductions) – up to $39.2 million 15 11.11%  
No tax increases. Use some or all of available rainy day funds, gas well revenues. (note: only available for one year) -- up to $66.4 million) 83 61.48%  

6. Please indicate the top 3 revenue options you would consider to help balance the 2011 budget.
Answer Count Percentage
Raise property taxes by 2 cents 30 22.22%  
Raise property taxes by 4 cents 6 4.44%  
Reduce homestead exemption (does not include senior tax freeze, over 65 or disabled) 21 15.56%  
Eliminate homestead exemption (does not include senior tax freeze, over 65 or disabled) 3 2.22%  
Use rainy day funds that exceed required reserve balances 81 60.00%  
Use gas well revenue from property tax on minerals 97 71.85%  
Use gas well revenue from bonuses, royalties and pipeline licenses 116 85.93%  
Transportation user / developer impact fees 51 37.78%  

7. Years you have lived in Fort Worth
Answer Count Percentage
0-10 28 20.74%  
10-25 31 22.96%  
25-40 35 25.93%  
Over 40 41 30.37%